How much of love

I found an old file full of things I wrote years ago, back in the days when one used a typewriter and paper. Here is one of them:



How much of love
Can be grown in a field
Of sun-warmed, red tomatoes?
Living, liquid life
Transformed
Into abstractions, rational relations,
Love of men,
Mankind,
Mathematics,
A washed dinner plate.

External things which are only
Phenomenologically true, perhaps, but nonetheless are
Hardly the crystallized works of a dead
Artist’s thought. Or the insubstantial
Hallucination
Of an amazed psychotic.

And then, too, remember that
Undefined warmth that puts sway in the hips,
As real as a tomato patch
And as insistent as the need to sing,
Ripened red by the same sunshine.

In the beginning was hardly the word.
In the beginning
(as always is)
Was the multitude of precious things.

Curious George

I found this very curious video of Werner Herzog reading his own existential/ pessimistic version of "Curious George". Enjoy.

Source: http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/

The price of ignorance

This video was taken from this address;

The problem is that it is almost indistinguishable from real news. On CNN and FOX one sees crying women demanding the return of "their country", a place that is never defined but seems to refer to where social exclusion continues to be practiced.

This is the price for not having educated a large part of the population.



Referencias:

Video: http://www.commondreams.org/video/2009/09/08
Letras ornatas: http://retrokat.com/medieval/leil.htm

Goodbye, Teddy Kennedy

Fuente


Perhaps the best of all three Kennedy brothers has left us. I can only say how sorry I am. This marks the almost-end of the great democrats, the last of those who thought that personal and collective liberty could coexist. How very sorry I am!!




Fuente

This cartoon by Zanetti, was published in the New York Times (on line). It had a different message: it decried the occult danger represented by the banking system. I modified it, first in PowerPoint to change the words, and then in Adobe Photoshop to fix some design problems. Now it denounces the dangers of Fascism that seem to be appearing again, the old phantom that once ran through Europe, but now seems more universal and more deadly.

Helen Thomas

Helen Thomas is one of Washington's most ethical and esteemed reporters. She is a Hearst White House columnist and currently writes for the Boston Channel, WCVB TV.

Murder is murder

This posting is about universal civil rights and how U.S. citizens must regain respect for international law. The news-media's capacity for double-think (term taken from Orwell’s novel, 1984) is fully developed in 2009. All of us, seem to be able to accept without apparent cognitive dissonance these two events:

1. In Raleigh, North Carolina “Federal authorities are searching for an eighth alleged member of a North Carolina group that authorities say plotted "violent jihad" overseas, prosecutors said Tuesday…. Seven other men have been arrested on charges of supporting terrorism and conspiracy to commit murder abroad" (CNN, 29th of July, 2009). I underline that this plotting is considered to be a crime.

2. “ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — The United States conducted two drone missile strikes in Pakistan's South Waziristan region Wednesday, killing at least 45 people, in the latest example of expanded direct American support for Pakistan's military offensive against key Pakistani insurgent leaders” (Saeed Shah, Wed Jul 8, 2009). I understand that this killing is considered acceptable by the U.S. government and new media, even patriotic.

First of all, I want to declare that I believe all assassination to be unlawful, immoral, and inefficient as a method of social control. I do not condone either side. But people’s capacity for choosing sides and saying that the same conduct is OK when “we” do it, but criminal if “they” do it is perplexing to say the least. According to the news sources I have seen and read, if you are Moslem and want to kill people, well, you should be tried and sent to jail, or even killed outright by a drone. But if you are part of the U.S. “war effort”, it's a patriotic thing to do.

In my book, murder is murder, even when the objective is a known criminal. Civil rights is one of democracy’s chief historical conquests: everyone has a right to his/her day in court. Kings and generals do not have the right to “hit” or “put people out” –to use the latest euphemisms for homicide.

In addition to all the killing, another result of all the violence in Pakistan, in which everyone (insurgents, U.S. drone-bombing, and local armed forces) participates, is:

“Pakistan is experiencing its worst refugee crisis since partition from India in 1947, and while the world may be familiar with the tent camps that have rolled out like carpets since its operation against the Taliban started in April, the overwhelming majority of the nearly three million people who have fled live unseen in houses and schools, according to aid agencies” (Sabrina Tavernise, June 17, 2009.

This is not right.

References:

1. CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/07/29/north.carolina.terrorism.charges/index.html
2. Saeed Shah, McClatchy Newspapers, Wed Jul 8, 6:33 pm ET, http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/3268368
3. Sabrina Tavernise, June 17, 2009, New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/18/world/asia/18refugee.html
4. Ornate letter: http://retrokat.com/medieval/leil.htm